The age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) II Risk Score for cardiac surgery: updated but still parsimonious

Eur Heart JPublished Risk score development and validation study

Authors' conclusion

The ACEF II allows the inclusion of emergency patients and, through a re-modulation of the coefficients and the inclusion of anaemia, appears more adequate to the present cardiac surgery scenario.

Study context

Population
Consecutive cardiac surgery patients; development at one institution, validation at a different institutiondevelopment 7011
Comparison
ACEF II vs ACEF vs EuroSCORE II
Outcome
Operative mortality (in hospital or 30 days after surgery)
Methodological detailsexternal validation, multivariable logistic regression
  • External validation
  • Multivariable logistic regression

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Discrimination for operative mortality

ACEF II

0.814

c-statistics

ACEF

0.773

c-statistics

P = 0.041

Further findings

External validation

ACEF II confirmed better discrimination than ACEF and good calibration

Original publication

The ACEF II Risk Score for cardiac surgery: updated but still parsimonious. Eur Heart J. Published 12 May 2017. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx228

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.