Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

The Different Risk of New-Onset, Chronic, Worsening, and Advanced Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis

Eur J Heart FailPublished Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of observational studies

Authors' conclusion

Our meta-analysis of observational studies confirms the different risk for adverse outcomes across the distinct HF stages.

Study context

Population
Heart failure (HF) patients in observational studies, 2012–2022
Participants
862,046 patients66 studies
Comparison
New-onset HF vs chronic HF (CHF) vs worsening HF (WHF) vs advanced HF
Outcome
30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality, and 1-year HF hospitalization
Follow-up
30 days and 1 year
Methodological detailsrandom effects meta-analysis, mixed-effects meta-regression
  • Random effects meta-analysis
  • Mixed-effects meta-regression

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

1-year all-cause mortality

Further pooled results

OutcomeNew-onset HFWHFP value
30-day all-cause mortality (hospital-admitted) · 30 daysNew-onset HF vs WHF · no significant distinction10.13%8.11%P = 0.10

1-year HF readmission

Followed a similar trend

Original publication

The Different Risk of New-Onset, Chronic, Worsening, and Advanced Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. Published 24 November 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3048

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.