The Stanford experience of heart transplantation over five decades

Eur Heart JPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In this half-century retrospective descriptive study from one of the largest heart transplant programmes in the USA, long-term survival after heart transplantation has improved over time despite increased recipient and donor age, worsening comorbidities, increased technical complexity, and prolonged total allograft ischaemia time.

Study context

Population
Adult heart transplant recipients at Stanford University, 1968–2020
Participants
1,958 adult heart transplantations
Exposure
Heart transplantation 2007-19 vs 1996-2006
  • 2007-19n = 515
  • 1996-2006n = 356reference
  • 1968-95n = 639
Outcome
All-cause mortality
Methodological detailssingle-centre, stabilized inverse probability weighting, Follow-up data updated through 2020
  • Single-centre
  • Stabilized inverse probability weighting
  • Follow-up data updated through 2020

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Survival

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Outcome2007-191996-20061968-95
Distance organ travelled (after stabilized IPW)159.3 ± 169.9 miles84.2 ± 111.1 milesNot reported in the abstract1968-95: not reported in the abstract

Total allograft ischaemia time (after stabilized IPW)

Total allograft ischaemia time increased over time
199.6 ± 52.7 vs. 225.3 ± 50.0 min

Original publication

The Stanford experience of heart transplantation over five decades. Eur Heart J. Published 1 August 2021. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab416

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.