Valvular & structural heart disease

Valve Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (VARC-HBR) criteria validation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients on oral anticoagulation

EuroInterventionPublished randomised clinical trial

Authors' conclusion

The VARC-HBR criteria effectively identified distinct subgroups with a stepwise increase in major bleeding post-TAVI. However, their predictive performance for individual risk was moderate.

Study context

Population
TAVI patients on oral anticoagulation in the POPular PAUSE TAVI trialpatients included · moderate bleeding risk (≤1 minor criterion) 332 (39%) · high bleeding risk (1 major or 2 minor criteria) 337 (39%) · very high bleeding risk (≥2 major or ≥3 minor criteria) 187 (22%)
Participants
856 patients
Predictors
VARC-HBR criteria
Predicted outcome
Major bleeding

Model performance

As reported in the abstract

up to 30 days after TAVI
AUC
Major bleeding
0.64(95% CI 0.58-0.70)
  • Moderate discriminative performance

Further findings

Major bleeding by VARC-HBR risk category

  • Major bleeding by VARC-HBR risk category: p<0.001

Calibration

Good calibration with observed outcomes, despite higher-than-expected event rates

Original publication

VARC-HBR criteria validation in TAVI patients on oral anticoagulation. EuroIntervention. Published 15 September 2025. doi:10.4244/eij-d-24-01066

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.