Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Withdrawal of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Improved Ejection Fraction

CirculationPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In patients with HF with improved EF, HF therapy withdrawal was rare. Withdrawing RASi/ARNi and MRA was associated with higher mortality/morbidity at 1 year. No association was found for BBL withdrawal, albeit with a significant heterogeneity for EF at improvement, suggesting better outcomes with continuing BBL only until EF improves up to 50%.

Study context

Population
Patients with heart failure (HF) and improved ejection fraction (EF) (first EF <40%, later EF ≥40%), Swedish HF registry, 2000–2023
Participants
8,728 patients
Exposure
Withdrawal vs continuation of GDMT
Methodological detailsregistry-based, overlap weighting
  • Registry-based
  • Overlap weighting

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

CV mortality/hospitalization for HF · 1 year

Renin-angiotensin inhibitors (RASi)/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) withdrawal: higher risk

38%

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) withdrawal: higher risk

36%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Withdrawal rates at improved EF registration

RASi/ARNi
4.4%
Beta-blockers (BBL)
3.3%
MRA
17.2%

BBL withdrawal, by improved EF 40% to 49% vs ≥50% (subgroup)

Higher risk of the primary outcome with BBL withdrawal in improved EF 40% to 49%
  • Interaction P 0.03

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Withdrawal of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Improved Ejection Fraction. Circulation. Published 17 March 2025. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.124.072855

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.