Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Added value of semi-quantitative analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of device-related infections in patients with a left ventricular assist device

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingPublished Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

[18F]FDG PET/CT reliably predicts the presence of DRI in LVAD recipients. Semi-quantitative analysis may increase the specificity of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the analysis of central device component infection

Study context

Population
LVAD recipients undergoing [18F]FDG PET/CT for suspected device-related infection, 2012–2020
Participants
41 recipients59 episodes
Comparison
Visual vs semi-quantitative analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy for DRI vs final diagnosis (multidisciplinary consensus and surgical findings)

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Driveline infection
Test or modelSensitivitySpecificity
Visual analysis0.790.71
Semi-quantitative analysis0.940.83

Sensitivity

Visual analysis0.79
Semi-quantitative analysis0.94

Specificity

Visual analysis0.71
Semi-quantitative analysis0.83

Further findings

OutcomeVisual analysisSemi-quantitative analysisP value
Central device component infectionP = 0.05
Sensitivity0.751.0
Specificity0.600.8
  • Central device component infection: Central device infection in 6 (11%), combined in 2 (4%) episodes

Original publication

Added value of semi-quantitative analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of device-related infections in patients with a left ventricular assist device. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 27 December 2022. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeac260

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.