Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

AI-ECG Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation: Real-World Performance and Explainability

JACC AdvPublished multicenter real-world cohort

Authors' conclusion

AI-ECG provides rapid, low-cost AF risk estimation from a single sinus rhythm ECG; however, its predictive performance is modest compared with clinical scores. At present, AI-ECG may complement, but not replace, traditional risk stratification.

Study context

Population
Patients aged ≥40 years who underwent 12-lead ECGs using an AI-enabled electrocardiograph (FCP-9900)patients enrolled
Participants
665 patients
Index test or model
Machine-learning models using clinical and ECG-derived variables vs AI-ECG alone for atrial fibrillation (AF)
Target condition
atrial fibrillation (AF)
Methodological detailsinternal validation by stratified 10-fold cross-validation, external validation in an independent cohort, SHapley Additive exPlanations
  • Internal validation by stratified 10-fold cross-validation
  • External validation in an independent cohort
  • SHapley Additive exPlanations

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Test or modelAUCArea under the receiver operating characteristic curve
Model 2 support vector machine1.00— not stated in the abstract
Model 2 adaptive boosting0.97-0.98— not stated in the abstract
Model 2 artificial neural network0.89-0.95— not stated in the abstract
AI-ECG alone— not stated in the abstract0.64-0.69

AUC

Model 2 support vector machine1.00
Model 2 adaptive boosting0.97-0.98
Model 2 artificial neural network0.89-0.95
AI-ECG alone— not stated in the abstract

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

Model 2 support vector machine— not stated in the abstract
Model 2 adaptive boosting— not stated in the abstract
Model 2 artificial neural network— not stated in the abstract
AI-ECG alone0.64-0.69

— not stated in the abstract

Further findings

AF prevalence across AI-ECG risk categories

AF prevalence increased across AI-ECG risk categories, with significantly higher odds in the mid-high and high groups vs low

Feature contributions (SHapley Additive exPlanations)

CHA2DS2-VASc the most influential predictor; AI-ECG provided modest incremental value

Original publication

AI-ECG Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation: Real-World Performance and Explainability. JACC Adv. Published 22 July 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103036

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.