Aortic & peripheral vascular diseaseMeta-analysis

Aortic dimension in elite athletes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Eur J Prev CardiolPublished

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis
  • random-effects model

Authors' conclusion

Absolute AoSV was mildly larger in athletes compared with non-athlete healthy controls, even when indexed to height. However, no differences were evident when indexed by BSA, irrespective of sex, type of sport, and age.

Study context

Population
Elite athletes and non-athlete healthy controls with echocardiographic aortic diameters (studies 1981–2024)21 studies
Participants
9,464 vs 2,637
Comparison
Elite athletes vs non-athlete healthy controls
  • Elite athletesn = 9,464
  • Non-athlete controlsn = 2,637reference
Outcome
Echocardiographic aortic diameter at the sinus of Valsalva (AoSV)

Pooled result

Absolute AoSV

MD

1.69 mm

95% CI 1.01–2.37

P < 0.001

Elite athletes vs Non-athlete controls
MD 1.69 mm (95% CI 1.01–2.37); P < 0.001

As reported in the abstract

Further pooled results

OutcomeMD (mm/m) (95% CI)P value
AoSV indexed to height (AoSV/h) — Elite athletes vs Non-athlete controls · Analysis by sex not performed (paucity of studies)0.04 (−0.00-0.08)
OutcomeMD (mm/m²) (95% CI)P value
AoSV indexed to BSA (AoSV/BSA)0.04 (−0.25-0.34)P = 0.880
Outcomeeffect size (95% CI)P value
AoSV indexed to height (AoSV/h) — Elite athletes vs Non-athlete controls · Analysis by sex not performed (paucity of studies)2.18 (1.10–3.26)P < 0.001

AoSV indexed to BSA (AoSV/BSA)

No differences, also according to sex

Influence of age

Findings not influenced by age

Original publication

Aortic dimension in elite athletes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. Published 26 November 2024. doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae385

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it