Aortic & peripheral vascular diseaseCohort study

Reappraisal of Surgical Threshold in Patients With Ascending Aortic Dilation

JACC AdvPublished

  • cohort
  • derivation cohort
  • validation cohort

Authors' conclusion

Indexing AA dimensions to height better identifies high-risk AA patients, particularly women, who fall below surgical criteria. Further studies are needed to determine if this cohort may benefit from earlier intervention at lower size thresholds.

Study context

Population
Patients with ascending aortopathy (AA) (4–5 cm) diagnosed on echocardiography (2010–2023); patients with syndromic aortopathy and acute aortic dissection/rupture at presentation excluded68 ± 13 years, 79% men, 28% with bicuspid aortic valve · aortic surgery 2,196 · unoperated 8,887 · derivation cohort (unoperated) 3,887 · validation cohort 5,000
Participants
11,083 patients
Exposure
operated group vs unoperated group
  • operated groupn = 2,196
  • unoperated groupn = 8,887
Outcome
Mortality
Follow-up
6 ± 4 years

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Validation cohort: AA height index (AHI) ≥2.5 cm/m and cross-sectional area-to-height (CSAH) ≥9 cm²/m associated with higher long-term mortality
both P < 0.05

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Aortic dimensions

Mean AA diameter
4.4 ± 0.2 cm
Mean AHI
2.53 ± 0.3 cm/m
Mean CSAH
8.8 ± 1 cm²/m

Safety

Outcomeoperated groupunoperated group
Aortic dissection and rupture
Aortic dissectionsNot reported in the abstract128 (1.4%)
Aortic rupturesNot reported in the abstract4 (0.04%)

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Reappraisal of Surgical Threshold in Patients With Ascending Aortic Dilation. JACC Adv. Published 15 July 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102859

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it