Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Associations Between Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury and Systemic Inflammation and Risk of Incident Ventricular Arrhythmia

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Prospective observational cohort study

Main finding · Incident ventricular arrhythmiaResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 1.63 95% CI 1.31–2.01

Authors' conclusion

Higher concentrations of cTnT, GDF-15, IL-6, and CRP associate with HF hospitalization and death, but only cTnT predict incident VA.

Study context

Population
Patients treated with ICD
Participants
489 patients
Exposure
Baseline cTnT, GDF-15, IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and incident ventricular arrhythmia
Outcome
ICD-detected incident ventricular arrhythmia
Follow-up
3.1 ± 0.7 years

Main finding

Incident ventricular arrhythmia · 3.1 ± 0.7 years

Hazard ratio

1.63

95% CI 1.31–2.01

P < 0.001

cTnT (per log-unit)
HR 1.63 (95% CI 1.31–2.01); P < 0.001

Per log-unit, as printed

As reported in the abstract

Patients with ≥1 ventricular arrhythmia
137 (28%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Baseline cTnT concentration · inclusion

Median cTnT 15 ng/L (Q1-Q3: 9-25); higher with older age, male sex, DM, CAD and heart failure (HF)
15

HF hospitalization and mortality

cTnT, GDF-15, IL-6 and CRP all associated with HF hospitalization and mortality

Change in biomarkers from baseline to 1.4 years and subsequent ventricular arrhythmia

Changes in cTnT, GDF-15, IL-6 and CRP not associated with subsequent ventricular arrhythmia

Original publication

Associations Between Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury and Systemic Inflammation and Risk of Incident Ventricular Arrhythmia. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 19 June 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2024.04.017

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.