Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of High-Risk Device-Related Thrombus in the Amulet IDE Trial

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Amulet IDE trial

Authors' conclusion

High-risk DRTs were observed in a higher number of Watchman 2.5 device patients compared with Amulet occluder patients. The composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular death occurred more often in patients with high-risk DRTs compared with those with low-risk DRTs or no DRTs. (AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder [LAAO] Investigational Device Exemption [Amulet IDE Trial]; NCT02879448).

Study context

Population
Patients with a successful left atrial appendage occlusion device implant (Amulet or Watchman 2.5)patients with a successful device implant
Participants
1,788 patients
Comparison
High-risk device-related thrombus (DRT) group compared with the low-risk DRT or no-DRT group; Watchman 2.5 device compared with the Amulet occluder
  • Amuletn = 903
  • Watchman 2.5n = 885
Outcome
DRT
Follow-up
Throughout 12 months
Methodological detailsAMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder [LAAO] Investigational Device Exemption [IDE] Trial, independent core laboratory, clinical events through 5 years
  • AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder [LAAO] Investigational Device Exemption [IDE] Trial
  • Independent core laboratory
  • Clinical events through 5 years

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Further findings

OutcomeAmuletWatchman 2.5High-risk DRTLow-risk DRT or no-DRTHR (95% CI)P value
Composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular death · Through 5 yearsHigh-risk DRTvs low-risk DRT or no-DRT— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract30.4%19.9%1.74 (1.03–2.92)P = 0.037
Cardiovascular death · Through 5 yearsHigh-risk DRTvs low-risk DRT or no-DRT— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract26.4%14.5%2.09 (1.20–3.66)P = 0.009

— not stated in the abstract

OutcomeAmuletWatchman 2.5High-risk DRTLow-risk DRT or no-DRT
High-risk DRT2.2%4.0%— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract

— not stated in the abstract

  • High-risk DRT: P = 0.030

DRT resolution

Low-risk DRTs resolved
12 of 15
High-risk DRTs unresolved
34 of 55

All clinical outcome rates · Through 5 years

Numerically higher in the high-risk DRT group compared with the low-risk DRT or no-DRT group

Original publication

Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of High-Risk Device-Related Thrombus in the Amulet IDE Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 9 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2025.02.016

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.