Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Clinical Validation of 5 Direct-to-Consumer Wearable Smart Devices to Detect Atrial Fibrillation: BASEL Wearable Study

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

In this clinical validation of 5 direct-to-consumer smart devices, we found differences in the amount of inconclusive tracings diminishing sensitivity and specificity of the smart devices.

Study context

Population
Patients presenting to a cardiology service at a tertiary referral centerAtrial fibrillation (AF) present in 62 (31%)
Participants
201 patients
Comparison
5 direct-to-consumer smart devices vs physician-interpreted 12-lead ECG (reference standard) for AF detection
Outcome
Accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) in identifying AF vs physician-interpreted 12-lead ECG
Methodological detailsprospective, consecutive enrolment, tertiary referral centre
  • Prospective
  • Consecutive enrolment
  • Tertiary referral centre

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Detection of AF
Test or modelSensitivitySpecificity
Apple Watch 685%75%
Samsung Galaxy Watch 385%75%
Withings Scanwatch58%75%
Fitbit Sense66%79%
AliveCor KardiaMobile79%69%

Sensitivity

Apple Watch 685%
Samsung Galaxy Watch 385%
Withings Scanwatch58%
Fitbit Sense66%
AliveCor KardiaMobile79%

Specificity

Apple Watch 675%
Samsung Galaxy Watch 375%
Withings Scanwatch75%
Fitbit Sense79%
AliveCor KardiaMobile69%

Further findings

OutcomeValues
Inconclusive tracings (algorithm unable to determine rhythm)Apple Watch 6 18% · Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 17% · Withings Scanwatch 24% · Fitbit Sense 21% · AliveCor KardiaMobile 26%
  • Inconclusive tracings (algorithm unable to determine rhythm): P < 0.01 for pairwise comparison

Rhythm determined by manual review of inconclusive tracings

Single-lead ECGs with rhythm determined
955 (99%) of 969

Patient acceptance

Apple Watch ranked first
39% of participants

Original publication

Clinical Validation of 5 Direct-to-Consumer Wearable Smart Devices to Detect Atrial Fibrillation: BASEL Wearable Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 18 January 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2022.09.011

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.