Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Clinician-reported physiologic monitoring of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest: A propensity-weighted cohort study

ResuscitationPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Neither clinician-reported ETCO2 monitoring nor DBP monitoring during pIHCA were associated with ROSC. Monitoring of ETCO2 was associated with 24-hour survival.

Study context

Population
Children with index in-hospital cardiac arrest with an invasive airway or arterial line in place, US registry hospitals, 2007–2021
Participants
15,280 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) events
Exposure
Clinician-reported end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) monitoring of CPR quality vs no such monitoring
  • ETCO2n = 1,335
  • DBPn = 1,041
Outcome
Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
Methodological detailspropensity-weighted, registry-based (Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation)
  • Propensity-weighted
  • Registry-based (Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

ROSC
  • Neither ETCO2 nor DBP monitoring was associated with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
  • 6829 airway and 2886 arterial line events analysed

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeaOR (CI)P value
24-hour survival · 24 hoursETCO2 vs No ETCO21.17 (1.02–1.35)P = 0.03

Original publication

Clinician-reported physiologic monitoring of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest: A propensity-weighted cohort study. Resuscitation. Published 23 April 2023. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109807

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.