Pulmonary vascular disease & thromboembolism

Contemporary Management and Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

J Am Coll CardiolPublished Retrospective registry analysis

Authors' conclusion

In the largest analysis of high-risk PE patients to date, mortality rates were high with the worst outcomes among patients with hemodynamic collapse.

Study context

Population
Patients with intermediate-risk, high-risk and catastrophic pulmonary embolism (PE) in the PERT Consortium Registry
Participants
5,790 registry patients
Exposure
High-risk PE vs intermediate-risk PE; catastrophic vs noncatastrophic high-risk PE
  • High-risk PEn = 1,442
  • Intermediate-risk PEn = 2,976reference
  • Catastrophic PEn = 197
Outcome
In-hospital mortality
Methodological detailsPERT Consortium Registry
  • PERT Consortium Registry

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Factors associated with in-hospital mortality in high-risk PE (multivariable regression)

OR (95% CI)P value
Vasopressor use4.56 (3.27–6.38)P < 0.01
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use2.86 (1.12–7.30)P = 0.03
Identified clot-in-transit2.26 (1.13–4.52)P = 0.02
Malignancy1.70 (1.13–2.56)P = 0.01
OutcomeHigh-risk PEIntermediate-risk PECatastrophic PEP value
Advanced therapiesHigh-risk PE vs Intermediate-risk PE41.9%30.2%— not stated in the abstractP < 0.001
In-hospital mortality, catastrophic vs noncatastrophic high-risk PE (subgroup)— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract42.1%P < 0.001
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and systemic thrombolysis, catastrophic vs noncatastrophic high-risk PE (subgroup)
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract13.3%P < 0.001
Systemic thrombolysis— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract25%P < 0.001

— not stated in the abstract

  • In-hospital mortality, catastrophic vs noncatastrophic high-risk PE (subgroup): Noncatastrophic high-risk PE 17.2%
  • In-hospital mortality, catastrophic vs noncatastrophic high-risk PE (subgroup): Catastrophic PE n = 197 [13.7% of high-risk PE patients]
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and systemic thrombolysis, catastrophic vs noncatastrophic high-risk PE (subgroup): Noncatastrophic high-risk PE Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 4.8% · Systemic thrombolysis 11.3%

Safety

OutcomeHigh-risk PEIntermediate-risk PEP value
Major bleedingHigh-risk PE vs Intermediate-risk PE10.5%3.5%P < 0.001

Original publication

Contemporary Management and Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 2 January 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.026

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.