Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesCohort study

Contemporary Pediatric Heart Transplant Waitlist Mortality

J Am Coll CardiolPublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • registry-based (OPTN data)
  • competing risks (Fine-Gray) and fixed-effects analysis

Authors' conclusion

The 2016 allocation revisions were not independently associated with the decline in pediatric HT waitlist mortality. The 3-tier classification system fails to adequately capture patient-specific risks.

Study context

Population
Children listed for heart transplant in the US (OPTN data), 1999–2023
Exposure
Era 3 vs earlier eras
Outcome
Waitlist mortality (death or delisting for deterioration)

Main finding

Waitlist mortality

Absolute difference

8 percentage points

P < 0.01

By group

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Outcomeabsolute difference (percentage points)P value
Illness severity at listing, era 3 vs era 1 — Era 3 vs Era 1 · less ECMO use6P < 0.01
Illness severity at listing, era 3 vs era 1 — Era 3 vs Era 1 · less ventilator use11P < 0.01
Illness severity at listing, era 3 vs era 1 — Era 3 vs Era 1 · less dialysis use1P < 0.01

Ventricular assist device (VAD) use and VAD mortality

VAD use higher (percentage points (PP))
13
VAD mortality decrease (PP)
9
  • P < 0.01

Non-White mortality

Decline (PP)
10
  • P < 0.01

ABO-incompatible listings and blood group O infant mortality

ABO-incompatible listings increase (PP)
27
Blood group O infant mortality decrease (PP)
13
  • P < 0.01

Match-run analyses

Poor correlation between individual waitlist mortality risk and match-run order

Original publication

Contemporary Pediatric Heart Transplant Waitlist Mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 13 August 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.049

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it