Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Feasibility and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation and closing patent foramen ovale without implantation: A pilot study

Heart RhythmPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Cryoablation is a safe and effective approach to close PFO in patients with AF undergoing PVI in a single procedure.

Study context

Population
Patients with both patent foramen ovale (PFO) and atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) via cryoablation
Participants
22 patients
Comparison
PVI + atrial septal cryoablation vs standard PVI
  • Group 1n = 11
  • Group 2n = 11reference
Primary endpoint
Co-primary: PFO closure rate; composite of AF recurrence and stroke/TIA
Methodological detailspilot study, sham-controlled
  • Pilot study
  • Sham-controlled

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

PFO closure rate · 6 months

P = 0.002

Further findings

OutcomeGroup 1Group 2P value
AF recurrence post ablation · 3 months27.3%Not reported in the abstractP = 0.269Group 2: not reported in the abstract
AF recurrence post ablation · 12 months18.2%%Not reported in the abstractP = 0.534Group 2: not reported in the abstract
  • AF recurrence post ablation: 6 months: 0 vs 0

Safety

Events

OutcomeGroup 1Group 2
Ischemic stroke · 1 year00

Procedure-related adverse events

No differences between the 2 groups

Original publication

Feasibility and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation and closing patent foramen ovale without implantation: A pilot study. Heart Rhythm. Published 12 June 2024. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.06.006

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.