Valvular & structural heart disease

Femoral or Radial Secondary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): A Subanalysis From the Multicenter PULSE Registry

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

During transfemoral TAVR, TR-SA was associated with lower rates of access site complications and severe bleeding compared to TF-SA.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR at 10 heart centres, 2016–2021 (PULSE registry)of 10,120 in registry
Participants
8,851 patients
Exposure
Transradial vs transfemoral secondary access for pigtail placement in TAVR
  • Transradial secondary access (TR-SA)n = 1,686
  • Traditional femoral secondary access (TF-SA)n = 7,165reference
Outcome
Secondary access-related vascular complications (VARC-3)
Methodological detailsregistry, multicentre, propensity-score matched
  • Registry
  • Multicentre
  • Propensity-score matched

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Secondary access vascular complications

P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Major secondary access vascular complications

P < 0.001

Minor secondary access vascular complications

P < 0.001

Secondary access vascular complications, propensity-matched

P < 0.001

  • Secondary access vascular complications, propensity-matched: matched cohort (1:1, 512 per group)

Safety

Primary access vascular complications

P = 0.93

Bleeding type III/IV

P < 0.001

OutcomeTR-SATF-SA
Surgical repair required0 events0.9%

Original publication

Femoral or Radial Secondary Access in TAVR: A Subanalysis From the Multicenter PULSE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 23 December 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.020

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.