Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

High Dominant Frequencies and Fractionated Potentials Do Not Indicate Focal or Rotational Activation During Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Mechanistic study

Authors' conclusion

Focal or rotational patterns of activation were not consistently detected at DFmax domains and CFAEmax sites.

Study context

Population
Patients with AF undergoing epicardial high-resolution mapping of right and left atrium incl. Bachmann's bundle
Participants
71 patients
Comparison
DFmax and CFAEmax sites vs non-DFmax and non-CFAEmax sites
Outcome
Patterns of activation (focal, rotational, smooth propagation, conduction block, collision, remnant activity) and potential types underlying DF and CFAE sites
Methodological detailsepicardial high-resolution mapping
  • Epicardial high-resolution mapping

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Activation patterns and potential types (median proportions)
GroupFocal wavesSmooth propagationConduction blockSingle potentialsFractionated potentialsFocal activationRemnant activity
DFmax0% [IQR: 0%-2%]22% [IQR: 7%-48%]69% [IQR: 51%-81%]72% [IQR: 55%-84%]4% [IQR: 1%-11%]
non-DFmax17% [IQR: 11%-24%]74% [IQR: 69%-78%]6%1 [IQR: 55%-65%]12% [IQR: 9%-15%]
CFAEmax1% [IQR: 0%-1%]52% [IQR: 43%-66%]1% [IQR: 0%-2%]20% [IQR: 12%-29%]
non-CFAEmax17% [IQR: 12%-24%]12% [IQR: 9%-14%]8% [IQR: 5%-10%]

Focal waves

DFmax0% [IQR: 0%-2%]
non-DFmaxNot reported in the abstract
CFAEmaxNot reported in the abstract
non-CFAEmaxNot reported in the abstract

Smooth propagation

DFmax22% [IQR: 7%-48%]
non-DFmax17% [IQR: 11%-24%]
CFAEmax1% [IQR: 0%-1%]
non-CFAEmax17% [IQR: 12%-24%]

Conduction block

DFmax69% [IQR: 51%-81%]
non-DFmax74% [IQR: 69%-78%]
CFAEmaxNot reported in the abstract
non-CFAEmaxNot reported in the abstract

Single potentials

DFmax72% [IQR: 55%-84%]
non-DFmax6%1 [IQR: 55%-65%]
CFAEmaxNot reported in the abstract
non-CFAEmaxNot reported in the abstract

Fractionated potentials

DFmax4% [IQR: 1%-11%]
non-DFmax12% [IQR: 9%-15%]
CFAEmax52% [IQR: 43%-66%]
non-CFAEmax12% [IQR: 9%-14%]

Focal activation

DFmaxNot reported in the abstract
non-DFmaxNot reported in the abstract
CFAEmax1% [IQR: 0%-2%]
non-CFAEmaxNot reported in the abstract

Remnant activity

DFmaxNot reported in the abstract
non-DFmaxNot reported in the abstract
CFAEmax20% [IQR: 12%-29%]
non-CFAEmax8% [IQR: 5%-10%]
  • DFmax vs non-DFmax: P = 0.001 — smooth propagation
  • DFmax vs non-DFmax: P = 0.006 — conduction block
  • DFmax vs non-DFmax: P = 0.003 — single potentials
  • DFmax vs non-DFmax: P = 0.004 — fractionated potentials
  • CFAEmax vs non-CFAEmax: P < 0.001 — smooth propagation
  • CFAEmax vs non-CFAEmax: P < 0.001 — remnant activity
  • CFAEmax vs non-CFAEmax: P < 0.001 — fractionated potentials

Original publication

High Dominant Frequencies and Fractionated Potentials Do Not Indicate Focal or Rotational Activation During AF. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 22 March 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2023.01.013

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.