Acute cardiac care & resuscitation
Impact of Female Sex on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report
Authors' conclusion
Women with HF-CS had worse outcomes and more vascular complications than men with HF-CS.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS or HF-CS) in the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group
- Participants
- 5,083 patients
- Exposure
- Women vs men with cardiogenic shock
- Womenn = 1,522
- Outcome
- Survival at discharge
- Follow-up
- Discharge
Methodological detailspropensity-score matched
- Propensity-score matched
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Survival at discharge, HF-CS (before PSM)
P = 0.009
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
AMI-CS
P = 0.03
De novo HF-CS
P < 0.001
Maximum SCAI stage E, HF-CS (before PSM)
P = 0.04
Pulmonary artery catheterization
P < 0.001
Heart transplantation
P < 0.001
LV assist device implantation
P = 0.01
Safety
Vascular complications (all CS etiologies)
P < 0.001
Bleeding
P = 0.01
Limb ischemia
P = 0.001
Vascular complications after PSM · matched cohort
P = 0.06
Original publication
Impact of Female Sex on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report. JACC Heart Fail. Published 6 November 2023. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →