Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

Impact of single vs. dual local anaesthetic regimen on the efficacy and safety of percutaneous stellate ganglion block for electrical storm: new insights from the STAR study

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc PharmacotherPublished

  • multicentre STAR registry
  • propensity score matching
  • multivariable analysis

Authors' conclusion

The combination of two local anaesthetics for PSGB is significantly associated with a greater likelihood of early and complete ventricular arrhythmia suppression in patients with electrical storm. Despite the need for randomized ad hoc trials, the dual-LA regimen represents an optimization strategy for PSGB, offering enhanced efficacy without an increased risk of major complications.

Study context

Population
Patients with refractory electrical storm (ES) treated with percutaneous stellate ganglion block (PSGB)patients, 422 PSGB procedures
Participants
298 patients
Exposure
single vs. dual LA regimen
  • dual local anaesthetics (LAs)n = 70%
  • single LAn = 30%

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Number of treated ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) · 12 h post-PSGB
  • Both regimens significantly reduced the number of treated ventricular arrhythmias

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Complete VA suppression · 1 h · significantly higher with dual LAs

P < 0.01

Complete VA suppression · 3 h · significantly higher with dual LAs

P = 0.02

  • Complete VA suppression: confirmed after propensity score matching and multivariable analysis

Safety

Total complication rate (driven by minor ones) · higher with two LAs

P = 0.02

  • Total complication rate (driven by minor ones): no longer significant after adjusting for the procedural approach (lateral vs. anterior)

Original publication

Impact of single vs. dual local anaesthetic regimen on the efficacy and safety of percutaneous stellate ganglion block for electrical storm: new insights from the STAR study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. Published 17 February 2026. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag011

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it