Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Importance of Systematic Diagnostic Testing in Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: Results From the Dutch Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation (iVF) Registry

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Retrospective cohort study

Main finding · Alternative diagnosis during follow-upResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.439 95% CI 0.219–0.878

Authors' conclusion

Although adherence to (near) complete diagnostic testing in this population of iVF patients increased over the years, patients with iVF still undergo varying levels of diagnostic evaluation. The latter leads to initial underdiagnosis of alternative conditions and is associated with a worse prognosis.

Study context

Population
Patients with idiopathic VF (iVF) from 11 secondary and tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands
Participants
423 patients11 hospitals
Exposure
Consistent high-yield diagnostic testing vs not, in initial work-up
Outcome
Alternative diagnosis during follow-up
Follow-up
Median 6 years (IQR 2-12)
Methodological detailsmulticentre, Median age at index event 40 years (IQR 28-52); 61% men
  • Multicentre
  • Median age at index event 40 years (IQR 28-52); 61% men

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio

0.439

95% CI 0.219–0.878

P = 0.020

High-yield testingvs No consistent high-yield testing
HR 0.439 (95% CI 0.219–0.878); P = 0.020
Alternative diagnosis during follow-up (all iVF patients)
38 (9%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Mean

Outcome2000-20102011-2021P value
Use of high-yield diagnostic tests over time68%75%P < 0.001

Prognosis with vs without alternative diagnosis during follow-up

Worse prognosis for cardiac death with alternative diagnosis
P = 0.012
Trend toward more ICD therapy with alternative diagnosis
P = 0.055

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Importance of Systematic Diagnostic Testing in Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: Results From the Dutch iVF Registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 30 November 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2022.10.003

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.