Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Lesion area, ablation time, fluoroscopic time, and short-term outcomes among 3 pulsed field ablation systems

Heart RhythmPublished Comparison of 3 pulsed field ablation systems

Authors' conclusion

Despite similar total lesion areas, the PFA systems showed distinct lesion patterns. FP had the shortest procedure time, VP the lowest radiation exposure, and PS the least haptoglobin reduction, potentially indicating less hemolysis.

Study context

Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal and persistent) undergoing pulsed field ablationparoxysmal: 54, persistent: 21 · paroxysmal 54 · persistent 21
Participants
75 patients
Comparison
Pulsed field ablation (PFA)-related features among the FP, VP, and PS systems
  • FPn = 25
  • VPn = 25
  • PSn = 25
Outcome
PV isolation time

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

FP vs VP: P < 0.0003 · FP vs PS: P < 0.0003

Further findings

Fluoroscopy time — VP vs FP · lower with VP

P < 0.0003

OutcomeFPVPPSP value
Fluoroscopy timeVP vs PS · lower with VPP < 0.0003
Haptoglobin declinePS vs FP · smallest with PS35 (range 24–46)36 (range 11–52)8 (range 0–17) mg/dLP < 0.0003
Haptoglobin declinePS vs VP · smallest with PSP < 0.0003

Lesion distribution

FP created larger lesions for the posterior right inferior pulmonary vein (PV)
VP created broader lesions for the posterior left inferior PV (LIPV) and smaller for the posterior right superior PV (RSPV) and right inferior PV
PS created greater lesions for the posterior right superior PV and smaller for the anterior left superior PV

Original publication

Lesion area, ablation time, fluoroscopic time, and short-term outcomes among 3 pulsed field ablation systems. Heart Rhythm. Published 5 August 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.07.054

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.