Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Management and Outcome of Failed Transcatheter Tricuspid Edge-to-Edge Repair

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • multicentre
  • registry (FATE)
  • 31 centres

Authors' conclusion

Device-related failure after T-TEER is uncommon but clinically relevant. Reintervention achieves greater TR reduction and right atrial reverse remodeling than medical therapy, but events remain similar between both strategies.

Study context

Population
Consecutive tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) procedures with device-related failure (loss of leaflet insertion, single-leaflet device attachment or embolization) with moderate or greater residual or recurrent tricuspid regurgitation (TR), 2017–2024
Participants
2,278 T-TEER procedures
Exposure
Reintervention vs medical therapy for T-TEER device-related failure
Outcome
Coprimary: incidence and management of device-related failure; composite of death or HF rehospitalization

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Device-related failure incidence (123 failures)
5.4%
Loss of leaflet insertion
24%
Single-leaflet device attachment
75%
Embolization
1%
Severe or greater TR with failure
73%
Management: medical therapy
54%
Management: reintervention
46%
Death or HF rehospitalization (median follow-up 255 days); did not differ between strategies
38.2%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

TR reduction and right atrial reverse remodeling

Greater with reintervention than medical therapy

Predictors of adverse outcomes

Higher TRI-SCORE, AKI and greater discharge TR severity independently predicted adverse outcomes

Original publication

Management and Outcome of Failed Transcatheter Tricuspid Edge-to-Edge Repair. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 23 March 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2026.01.285

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it