Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the Danish-German (DanGer) Shock Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA CardiolPublished Secondary analysis of the DanGer Shock randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

Use of a MAFP reduces the use of vasopressors and inotropic medication while maintaining hemodynamic stability and achieving faster normalization of lactate level in patients with STEMI-CS.

Study context

Population
STEMI with cardiogenic shock (SBP <100 mm Hg or vasopressors, LVEF <45%, arterial lactate >2.5 mmol/L), 14 heart centres in Denmark, Germany and the UKof 355 enrolled
Participants
324 participants
Comparison
Microaxial flow pump (MAFP) plus standard care vs standard care alone
  • MAFPn = 169
  • Standard caren = 155reference
Primary endpoint
Hemodynamic status (heart rate, BP), arterial lactate and vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS)
Methodological detailsinternational, multicentre, open-label
  • International
  • Multicentre
  • Open-label

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

MAFP vs Standard careMean difference, mmol/L (95% CI)
Arterial lactate on ICU arrival, lower with MAFP; persisted through first 24 h
1.3(0.7–1.9)
MAFP vs Standard careDifference, hours (95% CI)
Lactate normalization (<2 mmol/L) earlier with MAFP
12(5–18)

Original publication

Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 January 2025. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.