Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

NEMESIS-PFA: Investigating Collateral Tissue Injury Associated With Pulsed Field Ablation

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished multicenter, observational registry

Authors' conclusion

Current PFA technologies are associated with worse troponin leak, hemolysis, and renal dysfunction than RFA. As PFA becomes mainstream, future studies appraising these effects and understanding the short term and long-term implications are needed.

Study context

Population
Patients who underwent AF ablation from March 2024 onwards with any approved pulsed field ablation (PFA) system or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)87.1% (n = 773) underwent PFA
Participants
871 patients
Exposure
PFA vs RFA
  • PFAn = 773
Outcome
Postprocedural change in troponin

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

PFA

13,551.0

ng/dL

RFA

127.5

ng/dL

P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomePFARFAP value
Postprocedural change in lactate dehydrogenase107.5 IU/L26.5 IU/LP < 0.001
Postprocedural change in haptoglobin−102.0 mg/dL−33.5 mg/dLP < 0.001
Change in left atrial ejection fraction−20.0%−5.0%P < 0.001

Biomarkers across PFA systems

There were also significant differences in biomarkers across PFA systems

Baseline characteristics

Age
68.9 ± 10.9 years
Male
70.8%
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
59.4%
CHA2DS2VASC
3.3 ± 1.3

Original publication

NEMESIS-PFA: Investigating Collateral Tissue Injury Associated With Pulsed Field Ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 24 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2025.04.017

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.