Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Outcome of septal vascular injury and perforation in left bundle branch area pacing: Evaluating septal integrity using an institutional protocol

Heart RhythmPublished study

Authors' conclusion

Septal perforations are the most frequent septal complication and are easily detected. Septal vascular injuries can be detected by dedicated protocols but occur rarely. None of these complications compromised septal integrity or function.

Study context

Population
Adult patients receiving left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) between March 2019 and October 2024
Participants
636 patients
Outcome
Septal complications
Methodological detailsstructured institutional protocol
  • Structured institutional protocol

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Septal complications

32

5%

Septal perforations

26

4%

Septal venous channel perforation (SVCPs)

3

0.5%

Septal coronary artery fistula (SCAFs)

3

0.5%

Further findings

Peak septal strain before and after implantation

Before implantation
20.4% ± 3.6%
After implantation
21.3% ± 3.3%
P
P = 0.16
  • No significant differences

Late perforations or ventricular septal defects

None observed

SCAF course

SCAFs healed spontaneously
Two
SCAF persisted asymptomatically
1

Key pacing characteristics and left ventricular ejection fraction · throughout follow-up

Remained stable

Original publication

Outcome of septal vascular injury and perforation in left bundle branch area pacing: Evaluating septal integrity using an institutional protocol. Heart Rhythm. Published 25 March 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1982

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.