Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Personalized screening before subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Usefulness and outcomes in clinical practice—the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) screening SIS prospective study

Heart RhythmPublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Traditional S-ICD screening was successful in our study in a high proportion of patients.

Study context

Population
Consecutive patients eligible for S-ICD implantation, 20 French centres, December 2019–January 2022
Participants
474 patients
Exposure
Personalized vs traditional ECG screening before S-ICD implantation
Outcome
Eligibility for S-ICD implantation (screening success)
Methodological detailsmulticentre, 20 French centres
  • Multicentre
  • 20 French centres

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Screening success

P = 0.002

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Signal detection on initial device interrogation after personalized screening

All patients implanted after successful personalized screening had correct signal detection

Safety

Inappropriate shock · 1 year

P = 0.003

  • Inappropriate shock: of 7 implanted with personalized screening vs 427 with traditional screening

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Personalized screening before subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Usefulness and outcomes in clinical practice—the S-ICD screening SIS prospective study. Heart Rhythm. Published 27 May 2024. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.043

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.