Valvular & structural heart disease

Prospective Quantification of Tricuspid Regurgitation With Echocardiography vs 4D Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

JACC AdvPublished prospective

Authors' conclusion

Grading of TR was frequently discordant between TTE and 4D magnetic resonance imaging. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical impact of concordant/discordant TR grading on multimodality imaging.

Study context

Population
Patients with ≥ moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on TTE, excluding other severe valvulopathy, end-stage renal disease, or pacemakerspatients enrolled (mean age 78.5 ± 7.6 years, 53.8% men)
Participants
52 patients
Exposure
TR grading with 4D-CMR and transthoracic echocardiography
Outcome
Agreement between TTE and CMR-derived TR volume

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Kappa (fair agreement)

0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.45

Patients with ≥ severe TR on TTE meeting severe TR volume criterion on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (TR volume ≥45 mL)

10 of 31 patients

32%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Agreement between TTE and CMR-derived TR fraction

Kappa (no agreement)
0.04, 95% CI: 0.13-0.46
Patients with ≥ severe TR on TTE meeting severe TR criterion on CMR (TR fraction ≥50%)
3 of 31 patients (13%)
  • CI as printed (0.13-0.46) does not contain the point estimate 0.04; 3 of 31 printed as 13%

Interval between CMR and TTE

Median interval
2 days (Q1-Q3: 1-37 days)

Original publication

Prospective Quantification of Tricuspid Regurgitation With Echocardiography vs 4D Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. JACC Adv. Published 2 May 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101759

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.