Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Prospective randomized comparison between upgraded ‘2C3L’ vs. PVI approach for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: PROMPT-AF trial design

Am Heart JPublished Randomised controlled trial

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing first catheter ablation of persistent AFplanned
Participants
498 patients
Planned comparison
Upgraded '2C3L' vs PVI alone
Primary endpoint
Freedom from atrial arrhythmias >30 seconds without antiarrhythmic drugs (excluding 3-month blanking period)
Follow-up
12 months after index ablation
Methodological detailstrial design, prospective, multicentre, open-label, 1:1 parallel-control, Follow-up duration 12 months
  • Trial design
  • Prospective
  • Multicentre
  • Open-label
  • 1:1 parallel-control
  • Follow-up duration 12 months

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Original publication

Prospective randomized comparison between upgraded ‘2C3L’ vs. PVI approach for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: PROMPT-AF trial design. Am Heart J. Published 20 February 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2023.01.019

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.