Relative Benefit of Dual Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Oral Anticoagulation According to Time After ACS and PCI: Insights From the AUGUSTUS Trial

Circ Cardiovasc IntervPublished Secondary analysis of the AUGUSTUS randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

Among patients with atrial fibrillation with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, there was no difference in the relative benefit of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist or aspirin versus placebo when patients were enrolled early versus later after their index event.

Study context

Population
Patients with AF and ACS or PCI on oral anticoagulationwith time-to-enrolment data
Participants
4,605 patients
Comparison
Aspirin vs placebo and apixaban vs VKA, by time from index ACS/PCI to enrolment (<6 vs ≥6 days)
Methodological detailsopen-label, 2 x 2 factorial
  • Open-label
  • 2 x 2 factorial

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Death or ischemic events, by time from index event (subgroup) · 30 days
Aspirin vs PlaceboHazard ratio (95% CI)
Time from index event <6 days
0.55(0.30–0.99)
Time from index event ≥6 days
0.88(0.54–1.43)

Further findings

Median time from index event to enrolment (range 0-14) days
6

Original publication

Relative Benefit of Dual Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Oral Anticoagulation According to Time After ACS and PCI: Insights From the AUGUSTUS Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. Published 6 November 2024. doi:10.1161/circinterventions.123.013596

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.