Coronary disease & ACS

Reproducibility of bolus versus continuous thermodilution for assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with ANOCA

EuroInterventionPublished Prospective randomised crossover reproducibility study

Authors' conclusion

In the assessment of coronary microvascular function, continuous thermodilution demonstrated significantly less variability on repeated measurements than bolus thermodilution.

Study context

Population
Patients with angina and non-obstructive CAD (ANOCA) at angiography; measurements in LAD
Participants
102 patients
Comparison
Continuous vs bolus intracoronary thermodilution
Primary endpoint
Reproducibility (variability on duplicate measurements) of bolus and continuous thermodilution
Methodological detailsrandomised order (1:1), duplicate measurements
  • Randomised order (1:1)
  • Duplicate measurements

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Variability of repeated measurements
GroupCoronary flow reserve (CFR) variabilityMicrovascular resistance reserve (MRR) variabilityIndex of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) variability
Continuous12.7±10.4%12.4±10.1%
Bolus31.26±24.85%24.2±19.3%

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) variability

Continuous12.7±10.4%
Bolus31.26±24.85%

Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) variability

Continuous12.4±10.1%
BolusNot reported in the abstract

Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) variability

ContinuousNot reported in the abstract
Bolus24.2±19.3%
  • Continuous vs Bolus: P < 0.001 — CFRcont vs CFRbolus variability
  • Continuous vs Bolus: P < 0.001 — MRR vs IMR variability

Further findings

OutcomeContinuousBolusP value
CFRCFRcont significantly lower2.63 (SD 0.65)3.29 (SD 1.17)P < 0.001

Correlation between MRR and IMR

No correlation between MRR and IMR: r
0.1
95% CI
−0.09 to 0.29
P
P = 0.305

Fractional flow reserve (FFR)

Mean FFR
0.86±0.06

Original publication

Reproducibility of bolus versus continuous thermodilution for assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with ANOCA. EuroIntervention. Published 5 June 2023. doi:10.4244/eij-d-22-00772

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.