Coronary disease & ACS

Safety and effectiveness of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: insights from the SPUM-ACS study

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc PharmacotherPublished Prospective cohort study

Main finding · MACEResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.70 95% CI 0.49–0.99

Authors' conclusion

In patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and receiving potent P2Y12 inhibitors, we observed a reduced risk of MACE and an increased risk of major bleedings at 1 year in patients treated with GPI.

Study context

Population
Contemporary acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients (SPUM-ACS, 2009–2017)Propensity score-matched (PSM) population 1992
Participants
4,395 patients
Exposure
GPI vs no GPI
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE):
  • All-cause death
  • Non-fatal MI
  • Non-fatal stroke
Follow-up
1 year
Methodological detailsmulticentre, propensity-score matched
  • Multicentre
  • Propensity-score matched

Main finding

MACE

Hazard ratio

0.70

95% CI 0.49–0.99

GPIvs No GPI
HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.49–0.99)

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
NACEPSM adjusted0.87 (0.65–1.17)

Total coronary occlusion and thrombus at angiography

Total coronary occlusion, GPI vs no GPI
56% vs. 35%, P < 0.001
Thrombus, GPI vs no GPI
60% vs. 35%, P < 0.001

Subgroups

Results consistent across all subgroups

Safety

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Any bleedingPSM adjusted1.46 (1.06–1.99)
Major bleedingPSM adjusted1.73 (1.09–2.76)

Original publication

Safety and effectiveness of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: insights from the SPUM-ACS study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. Published 11 April 2024. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae024

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.