Coronary disease & ACS

Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

JACC AdvPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Pooled result · MACE in menResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.69 95% CI 0.58–0.81

Authors' conclusion

Despite the underrepresentation of women in IVI-guided PCI trials, this meta-analysis demonstrates that IVI-guided PCI confers a comparable reduction in MACE for both men and women, suggesting its potential to mitigate the long-standing sex-specific disparities in coronary intervention outcomes and supports its broader implementation in clinical practice.

Study context

Population
Men and women with coronary artery disease (presenting with acute or chronic coronary syndrome) undergoing PCIEight randomized controlled trials, 76.1% men and 23.9% women
Participants
14,812 men
Comparison
Intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided vs angiography-guided PCI
Outcome
MACE in men
Methodological detailsrandom-effects models
  • Random-effects models

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.69

95% CI 0.58–0.81

P < 0.001

IVI-guided PCIvs angiography alone
RR 0.69 (95% CI 0.58–0.81); P < 0.001

Further pooled results

OutcomeRR (95% CI)P value
MACE in women0.64 (0.49–0.82)P < 0.001
  • Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in women: Pinteraction = 0.62

MACE with intravascular ultrasound-guided PCI, by sex

Intravascular ultrasound-guided PCI reduced MACE in men and women compared with angiography alone
  • Pinteraction = 0.86

MACE with optical coherence tomography-guided PCI, by sex

Optical coherence tomography-guided PCI reduced MACE in men but not in women compared with angiography alone
  • Pinteraction = 0.86

Original publication

Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JACC Adv. Published 18 August 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102076

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.