Coronary disease & ACS

Sex Differences in the Density of Lipidic Plaque Materials: Insights From the REASSURE-NIRS MultiCenter Registry

Circ Cardiovasc ImagingPublished Cross-sectional analysis of a multicentre registry

Authors' conclusion

Women harbored greater condensed lipidic plaque features, accompanied by smaller atheroma volume.

Study context

Population
Patients with CAD in the REASSURE-NIRS multicentre registry; culprit and nonculprit coronary lesions
Participants
758 patients1,429 lesions
Exposure
Women vs men
  • Womenn = 150
  • Menn = 608reference
Outcome
Lipid plaque density index (maximum 4-mm lipid-core burden index / total atheroma volume at 4-mm segment) on NIRS/IVUS
Methodological detailsNIRS/IVUS imaging, multivariable-adjusted
  • NIRS/IVUS imaging
  • Multivariable-adjusted

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Adjusted lipid plaque density index
GroupCulprit lesionsNonculprit lesions
Women18.2±0.923.0±2.0
Men9.8±0.67.8±1.4

Culprit lesions

Women18.2±0.9
Men9.8±0.6

Nonculprit lesions

Women23.0±2.0
Men7.8±1.4
  • Women vs Men: P < 0.001 — culprit lesions
  • Women vs Men: P < 0.001 — nonculprit lesions

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeWomenMenP value
Adjusted total atheroma volume at 4-mm segment
Culprit lesions50.3±0.454.2±0.3P < 0.001
Nonculprit lesions31.5±3.044.4±2.1P < 0.001
Adjusted maximum 4-mm lipid-core burden index
Culprit lesions544.7±29.9501.7±19.1P = 0.11
Nonculprit lesions288.8±26.7272.7±18.9P = 0.51

Original publication

Sex Differences in the Density of Lipidic Plaque Materials: Insights From the REASSURE-NIRS MultiCenter Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 10 May 2023. doi:10.1161/circimaging.122.015107

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.