Cardiometabolic & kidney

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use and Levels of Hemoglobin, Markers of Iron Metabolism, and Erythropoiesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

JAMAPublished meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Authors' conclusion

In a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, compared with control, SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with small statistically significant increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. The clinical significance of these findings is unclear.

Study context

Population
Patients with 1 or more of the following conditions: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney diseaseparticipants in 85 randomized clinical trials · Placebo-controlled trials (78) 67,208 · Active-comparator trials (7) 3,335
Participants
70,543 patients
Comparison
SGLT2 inhibitor use compared with placebo or active comparator
Outcome
Changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit
Follow-up
Baseline to
Methodological detailsrandom-effects meta-analysis, randomized, double-masked clinical trials
  • Random-effects meta-analysis
  • Randomized, double-masked clinical trials

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

SGLT2 inhibitor group

Hemoglobin
0.55 g/dL (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.61 g/dL; P < .001)
Hematocrit
2.17% (95% CI, 1.95% to 2.39%; P < .001)

Control group

Hemoglobin
−0.08 g/dL (95% CI, −0.13 to −0.03 g/dL; P = .003)
Hematocrit
−0.13% (95% CI, −0.28% to 0.01%; P = .07)

Hemoglobin

SGLT2 inhibitor group0.55 g/dL (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.61 g/dL; P < .001)
Control group−0.08 g/dL (95% CI, −0.13 to −0.03 g/dL; P = .003)

Hematocrit

SGLT2 inhibitor group2.17% (95% CI, 1.95% to 2.39%; P < .001)
Control group−0.13% (95% CI, −0.28% to 0.01%; P = .07)
SGLT2 inhibitor group vs control groupDifference, g/dL (95% CI)P value
Hemoglobin
0.60(0.55–0.66)
P < 0.001
SGLT2 inhibitor group vs control groupDifference (95% CI)P value
Hematocrit
2.36%(2.19%–2.52%)
P < 0.001

Further pooled results

mIU/mL

OutcomeSGLT2 inhibitor groupControl groupDifference (mIU/mL) (95% CI)P value
EPO2.350.042.11 (0.5–3.71)P = 0.01
OutcomeSGLT2 inhibitor groupControl groupDifference (95% CI)P value
Transferrin saturation−2.2%−0.10%−0.84% (−1.21% to −0.47%)P < 0.001

Secondary outcomes (red blood cell concentration, erythropoietin (EPO), serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation, hepcidin)

Of the 6 secondary outcomes, 4 showed significant associations with SGLT2 inhibitors

Original publication

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use and Levels of Hemoglobin, Markers of Iron Metabolism, and Erythropoiesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA. Published 24 October 2026. doi:10.1001/jama.2026.19921

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.