Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Sport Type Alone Does Not Reliably Predict Distinct Cardiac Phenotypes in Athletes

Eur J Prev CardiolPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

ESC and AHA/ACC sport classifications capture population-level remodelling but cannot reliably be used to predict individual cardiac phenotypes.

Study context

Population
Elite athletes (310 women, 48 disciplines) and controls
Participants
1,024 athletes
Exposure
ESC and AHA/ACC sport-type classifications vs cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-determined cardiac remodelling phenotypes
  • Athletesn = 775
  • Controlsn = 249reference
Outcome
Whether sport classifications predict CMR-determined cardiac remodelling phenotypes (population level R2; individual level balanced accuracy)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of CMR remodelling phenotype by sport classification
ESC categories vs RVEDV, R2
0.170
RV remodelling prevalence, skill to endurance
8.3%-62.2%
RV remodelling, OR per ESC category (P<0.001)
3.82
AHA/ACC static component vs LV mass, R2
0.077
AHA/ACC dynamic component vs RVEDV, R2
0.072
Balanced accuracy, ESC (vs 25% chance)
34.2%
Balanced accuracy, AHA/ACC (vs 25% chance)
37.7%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

LV mass–RVEDV coupling

LV mass and RVEDV coupled increases, R2
0.23
Athletes with concordant patterns rather than discrete static or dynamic phenotypes
67%

Predominantly high-static athletes

Normal geometry
73.8%
Expected LV hypertrophy
17.5%

Original publication

Sport Type Alone Does Not Reliably Predict Distinct Cardiac Phenotypes in Athletes. Eur J Prev Cardiol. Published 30 August 2026. doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwag451

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.