Prevention & lipids

A streamlined cardiovascular-magnetic-resonance (CMR)-derived machine-learning model for estimating cardiovascular biological age: development and validation in the UK-biobank and multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingPublished development and validation of a machine learning-based cardiovascular biological age estimate

An erratum to this article was published (Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 1 Sep 2026 ↗)

Authors' conclusion

A biologically older cardiovascular system was independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes across both sexes. In females, advanced cardiovascular ageing also predicts all-cause mortality, irrespective of chronological age.

Study context

Population
UK-Biobank participants (development in healthy participants) with validation in Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) participantsDevelopment, healthy UK-Biobank participants 3,760 · UK-Biobank association cohort 31,784 · MESA validation 897
Comparison
HeartAge-gap (difference between HeartAge and chronological age) per one-year increase, for cardiovascular outcomes and mortality
Methodological detailsgradient-boosting regression, validated in MESA
  • Gradient-boosting regression
  • Validated in MESA

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Composite:
  • Cardiovascular outcome
  • All-cause mortality (events)
· median 5.5-year follow-up (IQR: 4.7-7.1)

Composite cardiovascular outcome

2316

7.3%

All-cause mortality

363

1.1%

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Composite cardiovascular outcome per one-year increase in HeartAge-gap, UK-Biobank — Each one-year increase in HeartAge-gap · females1.022 (1.001–1.044)P = 0.048
Composite cardiovascular outcome per one-year increase in HeartAge-gap, UK-Biobank — Each one-year increase in HeartAge-gap · males1.017 (1.002–1.033)P = 0.027
All-cause mortality per increase in HeartAge-gap, UK-Biobank (females only) · females · regardless of chronological age1.061 (1.007–1.118)P = 0.027
Cardiovascular outcome per increase in HeartAge-gap, MESA (females only) · female MESA participants · independently of chronological age and other confounders1.113 (1.025–1.210)P = 0.011
  • Composite cardiovascular outcome per one-year increase in HeartAge-gap, UK-Biobank: independently of chronological age and confounders including, body-mass-index, ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension

Original publication

A streamlined CMR-derived machine-learning model for estimating cardiovascular biological age: development and validation in the UK-biobank and multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 4 December 2025. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeaf337

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.