HypertensionSecondary analysis
Using PREVENT Equations to Compare Intensive vs Standard Systolic Blood Pressure Control for Primary Prevention in SPRINT
- Secondary analysis of the SPRINT randomised trial
- analysis by PREVENT 10-year total cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk strata
Authors' conclusion
Among SPRINT participants without baseline CVD, the relative risk reduction with intensive vs standard SBP treatment was consistent across PREVENT risk strata. However, the absolute risks varied several-fold from the low- or borderline-risk group to the high-risk group.
Study context
- Population
- SPRINT participants without prevalent CVD, with complete data for baseline PREVENT 10-year total CVD riskanalysed
- Participants
- 6,554 participants
- Comparison
- Intensive vs standard systolic blood pressure (SBP) treatment
- Primary endpoint
- Primary composite outcome:
- MI
- ACS
- Stroke
- HF
- CVD death
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Primary composite outcome, by PREVENT 10-year total CVD risk stratum · median follow-up 3.86 years
Intensive vs StandardHazard ratio (95% CI)
low or borderline risk (<7.5%)
0.74(0.33–1.66)
intermediate risk (7.5% to <20%)
0.70(0.52–0.93)
high risk (≥20%)
0.85(0.60–1.20)
- 4-year absolute risk difference, low or borderline risk
- 0.002
- 4-year absolute risk difference, intermediate risk
- 0.015
- 4-year absolute risk difference, high risk
- 0.024
Further findings
Baseline PREVENT 10-year total CVD risk
- Median PREVENT 10-year risk for total CVD
- 13% (Q1-Q3: 9%-19%)
- Low or borderline / intermediate / high risk
- 16%, 62%, and 22%
Safety
| Outcome | HR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Serious adverse events by PREVENT risk stratum — Intensive vs Standard · low or borderline risk | 1.12 (0.53–2.38) | |
| Serious adverse events by PREVENT risk stratum — Intensive vs Standard · intermediate risk | 1.66 (1.24–2.24) | |
| Serious adverse events by PREVENT risk stratum — Intensive vs Standard · high risk | 1.28 (0.87–1.87) | |
| 0.512Hazard ratio (log scale) |
- Serious adverse events by PREVENT risk stratum: interaction P = 0.44
Original publication
Using PREVENT Equations to Compare Intensive vs Standard Systolic Blood Pressure Control for Primary Prevention in SPRINT. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 28 October 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.037
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it