Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Weaning Strategy Using Adjusted Pulse Pressure by Vasoactive Inotropic Score in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

ESC Heart FailPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

PP adjusted by VIS taken 12 h following VA-ECMO initiation can predict weaning from VA-ECMO more successfully than PP alone, and its low value was associated with a higher risk of mortality in AMI-CS patients.

Study context

Population
Patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock receiving VA-ECMO, January 2010 to August 2021
Participants
213 patients
Exposure
Successful vs failed VA-ECMO weaning; 12 h pulse pressure (PP)/√vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) vs 12 h PP alone
  • Successful weaningn = 151
Outcome
Successful VA-ECMO weaning
Methodological detailssingle-centre registry, Serial PP and VIS measured immediately, 12, 24 and 48 h after VA-ECMO insertion; PP adjusted by VIS = PP/√VIS
  • Single-centre registry
  • Serial PP and VIS measured immediately, 12, 24 and 48 h after VA-ECMO insertion; PP adjusted by VIS = PP/√VIS

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Successful VA-ECMO weaning and its prediction by PP and PP/√VIS
GroupValuePP immediately after insertion, median (range as printed)PP/√VIS immediately after insertion12 h PP12 h PP/√VISPP immediately after insertion
Successful weaning70.9%26.0 (15.5-46.0)11.1 (5.1-25.0)24.0 (4.0-38.0)10.1 (5.7-22.0)
Failed weaning6.0 (3.1-14.2)12.5 (6.0-25.5)2.9 (1.7-5.9)21.0 (12.5-33.0)

Value

Successful weaning70.9%
Failed weaning— not stated in the abstract

PP immediately after insertion, median (range as printed)

Successful weaning26.0 (15.5-46.0)
Failed weaning— not stated in the abstract

PP/√VIS immediately after insertion

Successful weaning11.1 (5.1-25.0)
Failed weaning6.0 (3.1-14.2)

12 h PP

Successful weaning24.0 (4.0-38.0)
Failed weaning12.5 (6.0-25.5)

12 h PP/√VIS

Successful weaning10.1 (5.7-22.0)
Failed weaning2.9 (1.7-5.9)

PP immediately after insertion

Successful weaning— not stated in the abstract
Failed weaning21.0 (12.5-33.0)
  • Successful weaning vs Failed weaning: P = 0.386 — PP immediately after insertion
  • Successful weaning vs Failed weaning: P = 0.118 — PP/√VIS immediately after insertion
  • Successful weaning vs Failed weaning: P = 0.007 — 12 h PP
  • Successful weaning vs Failed weaning: P < 0.001 — 12 h PP/√VIS
12 h PP/√VIS AUC for successful weaning
0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.88, P < 0.001)
12 h PP alone AUC for successful weaning
0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.77, P = 0.002)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Mortality by 12 h PP/√VIS (low ≤7 vs high >7)Low 12 h PP/√VIS (≤7)vs High 12 h PP/√VIS (>7)6-month follow-up mortality · per-group values are in-hospital mortality2.41 (1.49–3.90)P < 0.001
OutcomeSuccessful weaningFailed weaningP value
PP and PP/√VIS immediately after VA-ECMO insertion
PP26.0 (15.5-46.0)21.0 (12.5-33.0)
PP/√VIS11.1 (5.1-25.0)6.0 (3.1-14.2)
PP and PP/√VIS at 12 h · 12 h after insertion
PP24.0 (4.0-38.0)12.5 (6.0-25.5)
PP/√VIS10.1 (5.7-22.0)2.9 (1.7-5.9)
Mortality by 12 h PP/√VIS (low ≤7 vs high >7)Low 12 h PP/√VIS (≤7) vs High 12 h PP/√VIS (>7) · in-hospital mortality · per-group values are in-hospital mortalityP < 0.001
PP and PP/√VIS immediately after VA-ECMO insertion — No difference in PP
P = 0.386
PP and PP/√VIS immediately after VA-ECMO insertion — No difference in PP/√VIS
P = 0.118
PP and PP/√VIS at 12 h — PP higher with successful weaning
P = 0.007
PP and PP/√VIS at 12 h — PP/√VIS higher with successful weaning
P < 0.001
  • Mortality by 12 h PP/√VIS (low ≤7 vs high >7): Low 12 h PP/√VIS (≤7) 44.4%
  • Mortality by 12 h PP/√VIS (low ≤7 vs high >7): High 12 h PP/√VIS (>7) 19.8%

PP and PP/√VIS at 12 h · 12 h after insertion

Serial PP and PP/√VIS at 12, 24 and 48 h significantly higher with successful weaning

Original publication

VA-ECMO Weaning Strategy Using Adjusted Pulse Pressure by Vasoactive Inotropic Score in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. ESC Heart Fail. Published 9 May 2024. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14836

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.