Prevention & lipids

Outcomes of cardiovascular screening in men aged 60–64 years: the DANCAVAS II trial

Eur Heart JPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary result · All-cause mortalityResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.94 95% CI 0.86–1.03

Authors' conclusion

Invitation to a comprehensive CT-based screening for subclinical CVD did not decrease death over 7 years among men aged 60-64 years but did increase severe bleeding.

Study context

Population
Danish men aged 60–64 years3,720 screened (62.6%)
Participants
31,268 men
Comparison
Invitation to cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening vs no invitation
  • Invitedn = 5,946
  • Controln = 25,322reference
Primary endpoint
All-cause mortality
Follow-up
Median 7.0 years
Methodological detailspopulation-based, parallel, 1:4 randomisation, stratified on municipality, only control group blinded
  • Population-based
  • Parallel
  • 1:4 randomisation
  • Stratified on municipality
  • Only control group blinded

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

median 7.0 years

Hazard ratio

0.94

95% CI 0.86–1.03

P = 0.169

Events by treatment group

Invitedvs Control
HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.86–1.03); P = 0.169

Further findings

OutcomeInvitedControlHR (95% CI)P value
MACE10.2%10.6%0.96 (0.88–1.04)P = 0.319

Safety

OutcomeInvitedControlHR (95% CI)P value
Severe bleeding6.0%5.1%1.18 (1.05–1.32)P = 0.007
Severe bleedingIntracranial bleeding1.23 (0.96–1.58)P = 0.097
Severe bleedingGastrointestinal bleeding1.18 (1.03–1.34)P = 0.014

Original publication

Outcomes of cardiovascular screening in men aged 60–64 years: the DANCAVAS II trial. Eur Heart J. Published 30 August 2025. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf704

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.