Coronary disease & ACS

Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease

J Am Coll CardiolPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

PCD-CT exhibited excellent diagnostic performance for detecting obstructive CAD. Compared with patients undergoing conventional EID-CT, fewer patients were referred to ICA after PCD-CT, but those referred were more likely to undergo revascularization.

Study context

Population
Consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated coronary CT angiography at a single centre, 2022–2023vessel-level analysis n = 1,686
Participants
7,833 patients
Exposure
Photon-counting detector-computed tomography (PCD-CT) vs conventional energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)
Outcome
Diagnostic performance for obstructive CAD (≥50% diameter stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography as reference) and clinical impact (ICA referral, revascularization)
Methodological detailssingle-centre, consecutive patients, blinded assessment
  • Single-centre
  • Consecutive patients
  • Blinded assessment

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) after CCTA, PCD-CT vs EID-CT
9.9% vs 13.1%; P < 0.001
Revascularization among those undergoing ICA, PCD-CT vs EID-CT
43.4% vs 35.5%; P = 0.02
Specificity for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), PCD-CT vs EID-CT (vessel level)
98.0% vs 93.0%; P < 0.001
PPV for obstructive CAD, PCD-CT vs EID-CT (vessel level)
83.3% vs 63.0%; P = 0.002
Diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD, PCD-CT vs EID-CT (vessel level)
97.2% vs 92.8%; P < 0.001
Sensitivity for obstructive CAD, PCD-CT vs EID-CT (vessel level)
90.9% vs 90.7%; P = 0.95
NPV for obstructive CAD, PCD-CT vs EID-CT (vessel level)
98.9% vs 98.7%; P = 0.83

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Referral to ICA

P < 0.001

Revascularization among those undergoing ICA

P = 0.02

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 28 October 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.069

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.