Congenital heart disease

Echo-Doppler and strain assessment of filling pressures in adults with congenitally corrected transposition and systemic right ventricles

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Despite the complex anatomy, FPs can be assessed non-invasively in adults with sRV without prior systemic tricuspid valve surgery. The current guideline algorithm for diastolic dysfunction in acquired heart disease has limited applicability in this population.

Study context

Population
Adults with systemic RV (TGA) without prior systemic tricuspid valve surgery, catheterization and echocardiography within 7 days, 2000–2021
Participants
47 adults
Exposure
High vs normal invasive filling pressures: echo-Doppler and strain parameters
  • Normaln = 21reference
Outcome
Non-invasive (echo-Doppler and strain) assessment of filling pressures
Methodological detailssingle-centre
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Echo parameters, high vs normal FP
GroupValueMedial e'Lateral e'E velocitySubpulmonic MR velocityLA reservoir strainSystemic right ventricle (sRV) GLSSubpulmonic LV strain
High filling pressures (FP)0.07 ± 0.03 m/s0.08 ± 0.04 m/s0.9 ± 0.3 m/s3.8 ± 1.1 m/s18.0 ± 7.6%−13.0 ± 4.4%−16.8 ± 5.7%
Normal FP44.7%0.08 ± 0.03 m/s0.08 ± 0.04 m/s0.6 ± 0.2 m/s2.8 ± 0.9 m/s27.9 ± 10.2%−17.9 ± 5.0%−23.0 ± 3.8%

Value

High filling pressures (FP)— not stated in the abstract
Normal FP44.7%

Medial e'

High filling pressures (FP)0.07 ± 0.03 m/s
Normal FP0.08 ± 0.03 m/s

Lateral e'

High filling pressures (FP)0.08 ± 0.04 m/s
Normal FP0.08 ± 0.04 m/s

E velocity

High filling pressures (FP)0.9 ± 0.3 m/s
Normal FP0.6 ± 0.2 m/s

Subpulmonic MR velocity

High filling pressures (FP)3.8 ± 1.1 m/s
Normal FP2.8 ± 0.9 m/s

LA reservoir strain

High filling pressures (FP)18.0 ± 7.6%
Normal FP27.9 ± 10.2%

Systemic right ventricle (sRV) GLS

High filling pressures (FP)−13.0 ± 4.4%
Normal FP−17.9 ± 5.0%

Subpulmonic LV strain

High filling pressures (FP)−16.8 ± 5.7%
Normal FP−23.0 ± 3.8%
  • High FP vs Normal FP: P = 0.63 — medial e'
  • High FP vs Normal FP: P = 0.88 — lateral e'
  • High FP vs Normal FP: P = 0.005 — E velocity
  • High FP vs Normal FP: P = 0.004 — subpulmonic MR velocity
  • High FP vs Normal FP: P = 0.0009 — LA reservoir strain
  • High FP vs Normal FP: P = 0.002 — sRV GLS
  • High FP vs Normal FP: P = 0.001 — subpulmonic LV strain

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

LA size

LA enlarged
83.0%
Mean indexed LA volume
58.3 ± 23.4 mL/m²

Original publication

Echo-Doppler and strain assessment of filling pressures in adults with congenitally corrected transposition and systemic right ventricles. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 22 July 2022. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeac115

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.