Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Endo–epicardial electrical disarray in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with ventricular arrhythmias

Heart RhythmPublished retrospective

Authors' conclusion

In patients with ACM, VFH identified a significantly increased heterogeneity in electrical propagation at sites of scar and DZs, but also in normal-voltage areas adjacent to low-voltage areas and on the endocardium. This could indicate microstructural alterations and/or transmural disease progression that are missed in traditional assessments but unmasked by VFH, and could complement existing substrate mapping approaches in ACM.

Study context

Population
Patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) with ventricular arrhythmiaspatients included
Participants
23 patients
Exposure
Vector field heterogeneity (VFH) values were compared between endo- and epicardial maps and across omnipolar voltage (OV)-defined regions
Outcome
VFH across voltage categories
Methodological detailshigh-density endo-epicardial substrate maps, 16-pole grid catheter
  • High-density endo-epicardial substrate maps
  • 16-pole grid catheter

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Scar (OV <0.3 mV), epi

0.57

0.28

Scar (OV <0.3 mV), endo

0.56

0.30

VFH differed significantly across voltage categories
P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeNormalBorder zoneScarDZs
VFH at DZsNot reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract0.59 [0.25]normal, border zone, scar: not reported in the abstract
  • VFH in border zone regions: border zone, epicardial 0.41 [0.42]
  • VFH in border zone regions: border zone, endocardial 0.39 [0.45]
  • VFH in normal OV areas: normal, epi 0.17 [0.27]
  • VFH in normal OV areas: normal, endo 0.29 [0.34]
  • VFH at deceleration zones (DZs): DZs during sensed extras 0.62 [0.28]
  • VFH at DZs: P = .88
  • Epicardial normal-voltage regions directly adjacent to low-voltage substrate vs overall normal-voltage areas: adjacent normal-voltage 0.26 [0.32]
  • Epicardial normal-voltage regions directly adjacent to low-voltage substrate vs overall normal-voltage areas: overall normal-voltage 0.17 [0.27]
  • Epicardial normal-voltage regions directly adjacent to low-voltage substrate vs overall normal-voltage areas: P < .001

Original publication

Endo–epicardial electrical disarray in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. Published 9 September 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.012

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.