Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Impact of Remote Cardiac Monitoring on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Global Cardiovascular Carbon Footprint Project

JACC AdvPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

RM of patients with a CIED resulted in significant reductions in GHG emissions.

Study context

Population
Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) on remote monitoring (RM), US
Participants
32,811 patients67 device clinics
Exposure
Remote monitoring vs conventional monitoring of CIEDs
Outcome
Reduction in cost and GHG emissions with RM vs conventional monitoring
Follow-up
2 years
Methodological details67 US device clinics
  • 67 US device clinics

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Savings with RM
Travel miles saved
31.7 million
Travel cost saved
$3.45 million
Greenhouse gas (GHG) from gasoline reduced (metric ton)
12,518
Page printouts reduced
14.2-million
Printout cost saved
$3 million
GHG from printouts reduced (tons)
78
Workforce efficiency savings
$3.7 million
Net saving
$10.15 million
Net GHG emissions reduced (tons)
12,596

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Impact of Remote Cardiac Monitoring on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Global Cardiovascular Carbon Footprint Project. JACC Adv. Published 3 March 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100286

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.