Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Incidence of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy Among Patients With Leadless Versus Transvenous Ventricular Pacemakers

Circ Arrhythm ElectrophysiolPublished propensity score-matched

Authors' conclusion

The incidence and characteristics of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy are similar between LP and TVP. However, patients with LP are less likely to undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade.

Study context

Population
Patients who underwent implantation of leadless pacemakers (LP) and transvenous pacemakers (TVP) between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2023, TriNetX Analytics Network database
Participants
2,594 propensity score-matched patients
Comparison
Leadless versus transvenous ventricular pacemakers
Outcome
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (new diagnosis of systolic heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <50%)
Follow-up
From the index hospitalization through December 2024; median 2.4 years

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

P = 0.187

Incident cases of PCM
422

Further findings

Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with pacing indications of complete heart block or atrioventricular nodal ablation (subgroup)

P = 0.948

Cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade · LP less likely to undergo upgrade

P = 0.014

OutcomeLPTVP
Baseline characteristicsbaseline LVEF 63 ± 7baseline LVEF 64 ± 8
Baseline characteristics — median age
73.8 years (±15)

Mean drop in left ventricular ejection fraction

Comparable between both groups

Original publication

Incidence of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy Among Patients With Leadless Versus Transvenous Ventricular Pacemakers. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. Published 25 July 2025. doi:10.1161/circep.125.013800

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.