Outcomes of non-ischaemic coronary lesions with high-risk plaque characteristics on coronary CT angiography
Main finding · VOCOResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 8.36 95% CI 2.86–24.44Authors' conclusion
In non-ischaemic lesions, ql-HRP and qn-HRP showed a synergistic impact on risk assessment and had prognostic interactions with FFR and treatment modalities.
Study context
- Population
- Patients undergoing fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided treatment, non-ischaemic coronary lesions assessed by coronary CT angiography
- Participants
- 458 patients697 vessels
- Exposure
- Lesions with quantitative high-risk plaque (qn-HRP) and/or qualitative HRP (ql-HRP) on coronary CT angiography vs lesions without; Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs medical treatment
- Outcome
- Vessel-oriented composite outcome (VOCO:
- Cardiac death
- MI
- Revascularisation)
Methodological detailsMean baseline FFR 0.85±0.12; 25.8% underwent PCI during the index procedure
- Mean baseline FFR 0.85±0.12; 25.8% underwent PCI during the index procedure
Main finding
VOCO
Hazard ratio
8.36
95% CI 2.86–24.44
qn-HRP(+)/ql-HRP(+)vs qn-HRP(-)/ql-HRP(-)
HR 8.36 (95% CI 2.86–24.44)
As reported in the abstract
- In medically treated lesions, both qn-HRP and ql-HRP associated with increased risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome (VOCO)
- P < 0.05
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
| Outcome | HR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| VOCO, PCIvs medical treatment in qn-HRP(+)/ql-HRP(+) lesions | 0.31 (0.11–0.91) | |
| VOCO, PCIvs medical treatment in qn-HRP(+)/ql-HRP(+) lesions, by FFR (subgroup)FFR 0.81-0.90 | 0.19 (0.04–0.90) | |
| 0.050.21520Hazard ratio (log scale) |
VOCO, PCI vs medical treatment in qn-HRP(+)/ql-HRP(+) lesions, by FFR (subgroup)
- Difference not consistent in lesions with FFR >0.90
Original publication
Outcomes of non-ischaemic coronary lesions with high-risk plaque characteristics on coronary CT angiography. EuroIntervention. Published 23 January 2023. doi:10. 4244/ eij-d-22-00562
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →