Valvular & structural heart disease

Outcomes of patients with early calcific aortic valve disease detected by clinically indicated echocardiography

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingPublished Retrospective cohort study

Main findingResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 2.9 95% CI 2.1–4.0

Authors' conclusion

Patients with ASc are >25 times more likely to require AVI than those with no CAVD

Study context

Population
Patients aged ≥18 years with initial clinically indicated echocardiograms 2010–2018, excluding impaired right or left systolic ventricular function or other significant left-sided valve disease
Participants
13,313 patients
Exposure
Aortic sclerosis or mild aortic stenosis (AS) vs no calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD)
  • No CAVDn = 8,973reference
  • Aortic sclerosis (ASc)n = 3,436
  • Mild ASn = 455
Outcome
Composite of:
  • CV death
  • Aortic valve intervention (AVI)
Follow-up
Median 4.2 (IQR 1.8-6.7) years

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio

2.9

95% CI 2.1–4.0

AScvs No CAVD
HR 2.9 (95% CI 2.1–4.0)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Need for AVIAScvs No CAVDAdjusted for age and sex26.8 (9.1–79.1)

Clinical events in mild AS

Clinical event rates accelerated after ∼5 years in those with mild AS

Original publication

Outcomes of patients with early calcific aortic valve disease detected by clinically indicated echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 17 October 2023. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jead259

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.