Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Role of NPPB for Recovery Post Ventricular Assist Device in Paediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Single-Cell Multiomics

ESC Heart FailPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Elevated NPPB expression and BNP levels at LVAD implantation are associated with LV recovery in paediatric DCM.

Study context

Population
Children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) undergoing LV assist device (LVAD) implantation, 2013–2023
Participants
25 children
Exposure
Recovery vs non-recovery after LVAD implantation
  • Recoveryn = 10
  • Non-recoveryn = 15reference
Outcome
Factors associated with left ventricular (LV) functional recovery (single-nucleus multiomics of LV tissue at LVAD implantation)
Follow-up
LVAD implantation
Methodological detailssingle-nucleus multiomics (RNA and ATAC sequencing) in six representative cases, histological and serological validation in full cohort
  • Single-nucleus multiomics (RNA and ATAC sequencing) in six representative cases
  • Histological and serological validation in full cohort

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Log2FC

2.698

P < 0.001

NPPB expression in cardiomyocytes (baseMean = 16 305)

Log2FC

1.17

P < 0.01

accessible chromatin peak at NPPB locus

Non-recovery

Serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
732 (372-4179) pg/mL
Proportion of non-apoptotic cardiomyocytes
0.21 (0.02-0.37)

Recovery

Serum BNP
3048 (642-6032) pg/mL
Proportion of non-apoptotic cardiomyocytes
0.37 (0.19-0.48)

Serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)

Non-recovery732 (372-4179) pg/mL
Recovery3048 (642-6032) pg/mL

Proportion of non-apoptotic cardiomyocytes

Non-recovery0.21 (0.02-0.37)
Recovery0.37 (0.19-0.48)
Gene ontology (GO) enrichment in apoptosis-related pathways
coefficient = 1.77, P = 0.023

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Baseline characteristics at LVAD implantation (non-recovery vs recovery)

Age, median (range), non-recovery vs recovery
0.9 (0.1-4.6) versus 0.8 (0.3-5.6) years (P = 0.8)
Male sex, non-recovery vs recovery
27% versus 30% male (P > 0.9)
Body weight, median (range), non-recovery vs recovery
5.9 (3.8-14.0) versus 7.5 (5.0-26.0) kg (P = 0.049)
LVEF similar, median (range), non-recovery vs recovery
24 (10-44) % vs. 15 (10-25) %, P = 0.2
  • Order as printed: non-recovery, n = 15; recovery, n = 10

Chromatin accessibility at NPPB locus (recovery-group cardiomyocytes)

Accessible chromatin peak at NPPB locus
log2FC = 1.17; P < 0.01

GO enrichment in apoptosis-related pathways

Enrichment in apoptosis-related pathways
coefficient = 1.77, P = 0.023

Serum BNP at implantation, median (range) · LVAD implantation

Significantly higher in the recovery group
732 (372-4179) vs. 3048 (642-6032) pg/mL, P = 0.04

Proportion of non-apoptotic cardiomyocytes, median (range) · LVAD implantation

Significantly higher in the recovery group
0.21 (0.02-0.37) vs. 0.37 (0.19-0.48), P = 0.03

Original publication

Role of NPPB for Recovery Post Ventricular Assist Device in Paediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Single-Cell Multiomics. ESC Heart Fail. Published 20 October 2025. doi:10.1002/ehf2.15430

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.