Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Sane Approach to Optimizing the Workload in Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

Circ Arrhythm ElectrophysiolPublished Sane Approach to Optimizing the Workload in Remote Monitoring

Authors' conclusion

Our data indicated that active evaluation of the clinical relevance of all alert transmissions and deactivation of clinically nonrelevant alerts reduce the remote monitoring workload. However, long-term follow-up is needed to ensure that patient safety is not compromised.

Study context

Population
Patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices under remote monitoringcardiovascular implantable electronic devices, 8182 transmissions
Participants
3,732 cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
Comparison
Alert rate from January to December after turning off clinically nonrelevant alerts
Outcome
Alert transmissions

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Alert transmissions

2306

28%

Clinically nonrelevant alerts, of the alert transmissions

57%

n=1290

Further findings

Rate of alerts · January to December

Decrease in rate of alerts
44%
January versus December, per device per month
0.07 versus 0.04
P
P = 0.001

Actionable scheduled transmissions

Scheduled transmissions
3335
Actionable, of the scheduled transmissions
11% (364)
Proportion unchanged during follow-up
P = 0.08

Safety

None of the deaths were linked to the adjustment of alert settings

Original publication

Sane Approach to Optimizing the Workload in Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. Published 20 February 2025. doi:10.1161/circep.124.013078

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.