Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Validation of the Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT) (prevention of arrhythmia device infection trial) risk score for infection and infection subtypes

EuropacePublished Prognostic validation study

Authors' conclusion

The PADIT score was independently validated with discrimination and calibration similar to the original derivation cohort. Importantly, prior procedures predicted pocket but not systemic infection. Overall, PADIT performed well in predicting both subtypes, with the strongest model fit observed for systemic infection.

Study context

Population
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) procedures at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 2007–2020
Participants
14,225 procedures
Outcome
PADIT score discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration for CIED infection and infection subtypes (pocket, systemic)
Methodological detailsprospective registry, single-centre, blinded independent adjudication
  • Prospective registry
  • Single-centre
  • Blinded independent adjudication

Performance

As reported in the abstract

CIED infection (validation of PADIT score)
Test or modelC-statistic, any infectionC-statistic, pocket infectionC-statistic, systemic infectionC-statistic, derivation cohort
PADIT score0.687 (95% CI 0.655-0.743)0.691 (95% CI 0.649-0.761)0.746 (95% CI 0.707-0.848)0.702, 95% CI 0.661-0.741

PADIT score

C-statistic, any infection0.687 (95% CI 0.655-0.743)
C-statistic, pocket infection0.691 (95% CI 0.649-0.761)
C-statistic, systemic infection0.746 (95% CI 0.707-0.848)
C-statistic, derivation cohort0.702, 95% CI 0.661-0.741
Infections adjudicated
103 infections (0.73%)
Pocket infections
71 (69%)
Systemic infections
32 (31%)

Further findings

Number of prior procedures as risk factor, by subtype

Strongly associated with pocket but not systemic infection

Original publication

Validation of the PADIT (prevention of arrhythmia device infection trial) risk score for infection and infection subtypes. Europace. Published 29 January 2026. doi:10.1093/europace/euag016

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.